导读:本文包含了民事证据证明力论文开题报告文献综述、选题提纲参考文献及外文文献翻译，主要关键词:证据,民事,证言,司法,事实,能力,制度。
民事证据证明力论文文献综述
龙文勇[1]（2015）在《民事证据证明标准类型化论证》一文中研究指出1991年的民事诉讼法确立了"事实清楚、证据确实充分"的证明标准,这显然和刑事诉讼的证明标准相混淆。这个证明标准如果说在计划经济时期和职权主义诉讼模式下还有其存在的土壤的话,那么随着我国改革的深入,其已经不适应市场经济不断繁荣和当事人主义诉讼模式盛行的时代要求。民事诉讼证明标准的类型化必然为大势所趋,这即是理论研究的新课题,也是司法实践中亟待解决的问题。(本文来源于《凯里学院学报》期刊2015年04期）
谭雅玲[2]（2008）在《程序价值及实体价值平衡视野——浅论民事证据证明能力及债务合法转移》一文中研究指出本文以现实案例为基础,运用实证案例与理论知识相结合的研究方法,论证了程序价值及实体价值平衡的法理基础,并在此价值视野下阐述了如何确定民事证据证明能力以及债务的合法转移,指出其关键在于运用非法证据排除规则确定证据的证明能力问题,并进一步论证了在此前提下如何确定民事债务的合法转移。(本文来源于《法制与社会》期刊2008年13期）
赵尊文[3]（2005）在《浅谈民事证据能力与证明力》一文中研究指出在民事证据能力与证明力的问题上,最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干规定》(以下简称《证据规定》)对证据能力的规则已经作出解释,但对整个证据审查,仍然没有制定较为完整的证据能力规则体系,而在证明力上却作出了大量的解释。本文拟就证据能力与证明力的内在价值关(本文来源于《山东审判》期刊2005年03期）
翟东堂[4]（2003）在《我国民事证据证明力制度之重构》一文中研究指出民事证据制度是民事诉讼制度的核心,民事证据证明力制度则是民事证据制度的核心。我国学术界对民事证据证明力问题关注较少,理论的匮乏导致了我国民事证据证明力制度的规定过于原则、简单且缺乏合理性,使法官在判断民事证据证明力方面拥有过大的自由裁量权,司法实践中也产生了诸多问题。为防范法官滥用自由裁量权,有必要重新构建我国的民事证据证明力制度。(本文来源于《华北水利水电学院学报(社科版)》期刊2003年02期）
翟东堂[5]（2003）在《论我国立法上民事证据的证明力》一文中研究指出民事诉讼的整个运作过程,皆是围绕证据进行的,当事人提出自己的主张要负相应的举证责任,当事人依据证据来展开攻击和防御,法官要对证据进行审查判断,而法官判断证据就是判断证明力的有无、强弱。民事证据证明力是民事证据的生命,是裁判者进行裁判的依据。我国立法上对各种民事证据证明力的规定不完善,理论上也缺乏研究。通过对我国立法规定的分析以及与国外立法的相关规定进行比较,提出对各种民事证据证明力审查判断规则,以指导我国的司法实践。(本文来源于《商丘师范学院学报》期刊2003年01期）
刘超,桂辉[6]（2002）在《怎样认定民事证据的证明力》一文中研究指出在民事诉讼中，一般是“谁主张，谁举证”：即当事人自己提出的主张，有责任提供证据。而在一些诉讼中，当事人往往只注重主张权利，而忽视收集证据或提供的证据无证明力。那么当事人对自己提出的主张，如何提供有证明力的证据呢。对此，最高人民法院《关于民事诉讼证据的若干(本文来源于《法制日报》期刊2002-07-13）
翟东堂[7]（2001）在《论民事证据证明力》一文中研究指出The probative of civil evidence force is the life of civil evidence. A Study of it notonly helps improve the perfectness of civil evidence system, but also contributes to therational construction of civil evidence system and certain substantive law systems relat-ed. Based on elementary theories of the probative force of evidence, this paper probesinto the problems existing in Chinese the probative of civil evidence system by examin-ing the probative force of civil evidence in different evidence systems from a historicalpoint of view and comparing the probative force of different kinds of civil evidence andputs forward suggestion for the reconstruction of the probative force system in our cou-ntry. This Paper consists of seven parts.Part Ⅰ: Introductory remarks. The probative force of civil evidence is inducedfrom the importance of civil evidence in modern civil action. The system of the proba-tive force of civil evidence is the core of the civil evidence system. Lack of study on theprobative force of civil evidence in our country's academic field in the past resulted inuncompleteness in legislation. Defects among legislation and related systems cause dif-ferent kinds of problems among judicial practice. Problems of the probative force of civilevidence should be studied eagerly in theory during the course of legislation and thepractice of judiciary. Those problems are rasied to be discussed in this part.Part Ⅱ: Basic theory of the probative force of civil evidence. This part defines theconception of the probative force of civil evidence, introduces views on the conceptionof the probative force of civil evidence in China, and puts forward the author's view inaccordance with the standard of defined conceptions and features of the probative forceof evidence.This part probes into the relation between the probative force of evidenceand the probative force of evidence,introduces some points on the relation between theprobative force of evidence and evidence credibility,and points out the shortcomingsexisting in different views. This part sums up the classification and features of the pro-bative force of civil evidence, which can be divided into different classifications accord-ing to different standards.The the probative force of civil evidence has three charcteris-ties, such as objective content, subjective form and changeable role.IJal-t IIl. Con1Parison and analysis of the probative fOrce of evidence in diffel.el1t ev-idellce systen1s. 'I'his Paper probes into the cl1aracteristics of the Probative force of evi-dellce in different evidence systems, such as system of divinty evidence, system of legalex'l,lcllce al1d systen1 of discretional evaluation of evidence. This paPer aIso anaIyses tl1eadvantage aIld disadvantage of evidence credibility in different evidence systen1sl I lll )l ll4Il (,()lllI);ll.is()ll. "l.llc l)r()l)flt ive f()l.cc of civil cvidcllce ull'lcr t Ilc systcI11 ()f LIivilltyevi'lcllce are ad judicated in line with evidence credibility showed by the will of G()d,whicll was born under the historic background of accusatory action, backward scientificcul1ure, uncomplete law enforcement agency, the political requirement of the rulingclilss. I)oubtlessly, the system of divinty evidence has hitoric advancement, but historicdefects also exist definitely among the system of divinty evidence. The probative fOrceof civil evidence under the system of legal evidence is stipulated by laws in advance,whicll are often divided into different grade. The effectiveness of civil evidence credibili-[y Llcl)ends on the form of evide11ce, not on the conent. For intance, exacting a confes-sio n by torture is used as a method to gain the strongest probative force of civil evi-'le11ce. ComPared with the system of divinty evidence, the system of legal evidence hashitoric advancement and historic defects. The probative force of civil evidence underthe systeln of discretional evalu(本文来源于《河南大学》期刊2001-05-01）
民事证据证明力论文开题报告
（1）论文研究背景及目的
此处内容要求：
首先简单简介论文所研究问题的基本概念和背景，再而简单明了地指出论文所要研究解决的具体问题，并提出你的论文准备的观点或解决方法。
写法范例：
本文以现实案例为基础,运用实证案例与理论知识相结合的研究方法,论证了程序价值及实体价值平衡的法理基础,并在此价值视野下阐述了如何确定民事证据证明能力以及债务的合法转移,指出其关键在于运用非法证据排除规则确定证据的证明能力问题,并进一步论证了在此前提下如何确定民事债务的合法转移。
（2）本文研究方法
调查法：该方法是有目的、有系统的搜集有关研究对象的具体信息。
观察法：用自己的感官和辅助工具直接观察研究对象从而得到有关信息。
实验法：通过主支变革、控制研究对象来发现与确认事物间的因果关系。
文献研究法：通过调查文献来获得资料，从而全面的、正确的了解掌握研究方法。
实证研究法：依据现有的科学理论和实践的需要提出设计。
定性分析法：对研究对象进行“质”的方面的研究，这个方法需要计算的数据较少。
定量分析法：通过具体的数字，使人们对研究对象的认识进一步精确化。
跨学科研究法：运用多学科的理论、方法和成果从整体上对某一课题进行研究。
功能分析法：这是社会科学用来分析社会现象的一种方法，从某一功能出发研究多个方面的影响。
模拟法：通过创设一个与原型相似的模型来间接研究原型某种特性的一种形容方法。
民事证据证明力论文参考文献
[1].龙文勇.民事证据证明标准类型化论证[J].凯里学院学报.2015
[2].谭雅玲.程序价值及实体价值平衡视野——浅论民事证据证明能力及债务合法转移[J].法制与社会.2008
[3].赵尊文.浅谈民事证据能力与证明力[J].山东审判.2005
[4].翟东堂.我国民事证据证明力制度之重构[J].华北水利水电学院学报(社科版).2003
[5].翟东堂.论我国立法上民事证据的证明力[J].商丘师范学院学报.2003
[6].刘超,桂辉.怎样认定民事证据的证明力[N].法制日报.2002
[7].翟东堂.论民事证据证明力[D].河南大学.2001