导读:本文包含了公共住房政策论文开题报告文献综述、选题提纲参考文献及外文文献翻译,主要关键词:住房,墨索里尼,政策,法西斯,太原市,模式,城市。
公共住房政策论文文献综述
陈景坤[1](2019)在《太原市公共租赁住房政策实施评价及对策研究》一文中研究指出住房——人类赖以生存的基本条件,也是人类共同发展的必要因素。就住房困难这一问题,我国政府部门采取了相关措施来保证人民的住房权益,如:颁布了廉租房、经济房的政策方针。然而,由于当前外地人口(打工仔、应届毕业生等)的数量在不断攀升,且他们徘徊于房地产市场和住房保障体系之间,达不到经济适用房和廉租房申请的基本要求,导致住房困难的现状日益严重。因此,为了解决这一问题,我国政府正不断的健全、完善公共租赁房政策,随着政策的不断的深化住房困难的情况有了初步有效的缓解,同时,也推动了我国住房机制的改革进程,进而有利于人民保障水平的提高。近年来,太原市虽积极响应政府号召,贯彻落实公租房发展政策。但由于起步较晚,在实施过程中问题层出不穷。因此,太原市需要对公租房制度进行科学设计和合理化的调整,进而推进制度的持续平稳发展。本文以太原市公租房政策实施评价为出发点,通过参考国内外相关研究,结合现状并借鉴威廉·邓恩《公共政策分析导论》的政策评价体系,以公平性、回应性,充足性为主进行阐述。其中主要以问卷调查和熵值法为分析方法对太原市公租房政策的实施效果作出了评估。结果表明:太原市公共租赁住房总体实施效果越来越好;房源的供给需求和居住水平质量对于现如今的公租房而言尤为重要。结合太原市实际情况及分析结果,发现存在法律法规不健全、公租房融资压力、供给主体单一、政策回应性不高以及准入准出机制等问题。最后依照我国先进城市实行公共租赁住房政策的情况,在此基础上对先进城市的经验进行了比较和分析,提出了有利于太原市公共租赁住房体系建设的建议,具体如下:第一,完善法律法规;第二,增加房源供应;第叁,合理规划选址区位;第四,探索多元化融资方式:第五,完善准入退出机制;第六,强化社会参与监督。(本文来源于《山西财经大学》期刊2019-06-02)
PARK,MISO[2](2018)在《韩中两国公共住房政策比较研究》一文中研究指出Over the past few decades,housing policies have played a more and more important role in Korea and China.Housing problems is more than just social issues but should considered as biggest part in current society.This problem is apparent that not all householders could afford the housing due to increased prices.Owning a house became a dream of young adults,and housing is considered as welfare system right now in society.Housing is one of the hottest topic in the world and which needs to be solved in near future.This study attempts to compare the public housing policies in Korea and China.Over the world,inequality in housing is one of the most important social issues that need to be fixed.Based on the situation of Korea and China,this thesis will analyze both country's housing policies and the programs that were designed for low income households.The public housing policies in these two countries need to be evaluated since public housing policies in any countries are not perfect.This thesis also attempts to analyze the case study of Seoul Metropolitan and Shanghai to compare and understand housing policy of these two countries.China and Korea are similar in East Asia countries but also different in government system,finance system and social system.Throughout the data analysis this study analyzed the background of housing policy in China and Korea how housing policy changed after the reforms.And also providing case studies,this thesis analyzed the current situation of public housing policies in specific cities.This thesis mainly compares the housing policy of two similar and different main countries China and Korea and discuss the advantages or disadvantages of different housing policy.This thesis is to learn from each other to improve public housing policies,provide more public housing for low-income households as well as to reduce housing inequality.Many factors affect the public housing policy,since housing issues are intimately related to political,financial and economic issues.In the last parts of this thesis,mainly focus on similarities and differences of China and Korea and found out each country's housing policy is implemented based on concerning country's different aspects.Many things in public housing policies are different in China and Korea,however,they needed to specify the demand and supply,allocations,tenants and law for housing.Both countries have problems and challenges in public housing,so that China and Korea could learn and think about current housing programs for low and middle-income householders.(本文来源于《浙江大学》期刊2018-05-31)
廖了,章冲[3](2018)在《法国公共住房政策演变及其启示》一文中研究指出中国住房商品化快速发展形成了一系列社会问题,然而中国公共住房总体体系发展滞后,尚待完善。法国公共住房体系作为发达国家公共住房发展模式典型之一,强调了国家主导、多方参与的多元模式。在过去一百多年过程中,法国公共住房政策经历了不同阶段的演变,从最初确立、政策演变、国家集中供给到多元化公共住房体系。当前法国公共住房体系以宏观调控为主,结合地方促进公共住房政策的具体实施机制,实现公共住房宏观管理与多样化的协调,完善公共住房资金多元化制度,强调严格的监督体系。同时,为了避免法国公共住房形成的社会分化问题,法国推动了城市政策与公共住房政策相结合的运动。中国在结合自身国情和借鉴法国经验教训的基础上,可以提出发展和完善中国公共住房体系的初步设想。(本文来源于《城市学刊》期刊2018年03期)
周晓红[4](2018)在《法西斯政权下的意大利公共住房政策和建设实践》一文中研究指出本文讨论了在墨索里尼集权统治下意大利公共住房政策的演变,以及米兰的公共住房建设实践的特点,提出国家住房政策往往会受多方面因素影响。(本文来源于《建筑师》期刊2018年02期)
周丽婷,杨干生[5](2017)在《中国城市公共住房政策执行力评估指标体系的构建——基于多层次模糊综合评判的分析》一文中研究指出城市住房问题是困扰经济发展和城市化进程的一大难题,其实质是公共住房问题,即中低收入阶层等困难群体的住房保障问题。因此,如何有效提升公共住房政策执行力,是当前各级政府公共服务和社会管理职能的集中体现。本文采用以模糊数学理论为基础的多层次模糊综合评判法来评估住房政策执行力,不仅解决了地方政府现在正遭遇的瓶颈问题,还为执行力的评估提供了一种科学、准确、易于操作的工具,具有方法学上的意义。(本文来源于《广州公共管理评论》期刊2017年00期)
李莉[6](2017)在《国内美国公共住房政策史研究》一文中研究指出第一次世界大战(以下简称“一战”)以来,公共住房政策成为美国联邦福利住房政策的重要组成部分,也成为美国政府解决城市低收入阶层住房问题的主要手段之一。对此间该政策的研究有助于我们了解美国住房保障体系的形成和演变,加深对美国联邦制、国家干预模式和福利政策走向(本文来源于《中国社会科学报》期刊2017-03-20)
杨梦颖[7](2016)在《新加坡公共住房政策之微治理探析及对我国扶贫启示》一文中研究指出新加坡公共住房政策蕴含丰富的内容,包括组屋的规划与设计、组屋的资金来源及组屋的分配。住房政策实行过程中,以公民参与为核心,以政府指导为手段,进而满足了人民的微心愿,重视了人民的微行动,兼顾了人民的微心理,从而使公共住房政策的微治理意蕴突出,这对我国精准扶贫过程中注重微行动参与、微制度构建及微心理关怀有重要启示。(本文来源于《河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版)》期刊2016年03期)
邵挺,王金照[8](2016)在《美国公共政策评估体系的运行情况及启示》一文中研究指出美国马萨诸塞州公共住房评估体系具有程序化、规范化、权威性等特点,政府部门利用计算机辅助系统,负责事前资质审核、准入条件评估和事中的建设进度评估。另外,由各个利益相关方、学者等组成的咨询委员会,负责事后政策效果评估,并监督相关部门提出相应的反馈意见。从运行(本文来源于《中国经济时报》期刊2016-07-06)
邵挺,王金照[9](2016)在《美国公共政策评估体系的运行情况及启示——以马萨诸塞州公共住房政策为例》一文中研究指出[目的/意义]借鉴美国麻州公共住房评估体系方法,对我国建立并完善科学合理的公共政策评估体系,有一定参考意义。[方法/过程]麻州公共住房评估体系具有程序化、规范化、权威性等特点,政府部门利用计算机辅助系统,负责事前资质审核、准入条件评估和事中的建设进度评估。另外,由各个利益相关方、学者等组成的咨询委员会,负责事后政策效果评估,并监督相关部门提出相应的反馈意见。[结果/结论 ]美国麻州公共住房评估体系对完善政府部门出台的公共住房政策,提高政策的有效性和针对性,都发挥了较重要的作用。(本文来源于《智库理论与实践》期刊2016年03期)
赵进东[10](2016)在《国外公共住房政策对我国保障房运营模式的启示》一文中研究指出伴随着城市化进程的不断加快,城市人口住房的矛盾逐渐加剧,如何实现"居者有其屋"的中国梦,应是政府及全社会在十叁五规划中的重中之重,文章通过对国外公共住房政策的研究,立足我国社会保障房的现状,结合新加坡、英国和日本的公共住房保障体系,提出适合我国基本国情的保障房运营模式。(本文来源于《社会科学家》期刊2016年06期)
公共住房政策论文开题报告
(1)论文研究背景及目的
此处内容要求:
首先简单简介论文所研究问题的基本概念和背景,再而简单明了地指出论文所要研究解决的具体问题,并提出你的论文准备的观点或解决方法。
写法范例:
Over the past few decades,housing policies have played a more and more important role in Korea and China.Housing problems is more than just social issues but should considered as biggest part in current society.This problem is apparent that not all householders could afford the housing due to increased prices.Owning a house became a dream of young adults,and housing is considered as welfare system right now in society.Housing is one of the hottest topic in the world and which needs to be solved in near future.This study attempts to compare the public housing policies in Korea and China.Over the world,inequality in housing is one of the most important social issues that need to be fixed.Based on the situation of Korea and China,this thesis will analyze both country's housing policies and the programs that were designed for low income households.The public housing policies in these two countries need to be evaluated since public housing policies in any countries are not perfect.This thesis also attempts to analyze the case study of Seoul Metropolitan and Shanghai to compare and understand housing policy of these two countries.China and Korea are similar in East Asia countries but also different in government system,finance system and social system.Throughout the data analysis this study analyzed the background of housing policy in China and Korea how housing policy changed after the reforms.And also providing case studies,this thesis analyzed the current situation of public housing policies in specific cities.This thesis mainly compares the housing policy of two similar and different main countries China and Korea and discuss the advantages or disadvantages of different housing policy.This thesis is to learn from each other to improve public housing policies,provide more public housing for low-income households as well as to reduce housing inequality.Many factors affect the public housing policy,since housing issues are intimately related to political,financial and economic issues.In the last parts of this thesis,mainly focus on similarities and differences of China and Korea and found out each country's housing policy is implemented based on concerning country's different aspects.Many things in public housing policies are different in China and Korea,however,they needed to specify the demand and supply,allocations,tenants and law for housing.Both countries have problems and challenges in public housing,so that China and Korea could learn and think about current housing programs for low and middle-income householders.
(2)本文研究方法
调查法:该方法是有目的、有系统的搜集有关研究对象的具体信息。
观察法:用自己的感官和辅助工具直接观察研究对象从而得到有关信息。
实验法:通过主支变革、控制研究对象来发现与确认事物间的因果关系。
文献研究法:通过调查文献来获得资料,从而全面的、正确的了解掌握研究方法。
实证研究法:依据现有的科学理论和实践的需要提出设计。
定性分析法:对研究对象进行“质”的方面的研究,这个方法需要计算的数据较少。
定量分析法:通过具体的数字,使人们对研究对象的认识进一步精确化。
跨学科研究法:运用多学科的理论、方法和成果从整体上对某一课题进行研究。
功能分析法:这是社会科学用来分析社会现象的一种方法,从某一功能出发研究多个方面的影响。
模拟法:通过创设一个与原型相似的模型来间接研究原型某种特性的一种形容方法。
公共住房政策论文参考文献
[1].陈景坤.太原市公共租赁住房政策实施评价及对策研究[D].山西财经大学.2019
[2].PARK,MISO.韩中两国公共住房政策比较研究[D].浙江大学.2018
[3].廖了,章冲.法国公共住房政策演变及其启示[J].城市学刊.2018
[4].周晓红.法西斯政权下的意大利公共住房政策和建设实践[J].建筑师.2018
[5].周丽婷,杨干生.中国城市公共住房政策执行力评估指标体系的构建——基于多层次模糊综合评判的分析[J].广州公共管理评论.2017
[6].李莉.国内美国公共住房政策史研究[N].中国社会科学报.2017
[7].杨梦颖.新加坡公共住房政策之微治理探析及对我国扶贫启示[J].河北科技师范学院学报(社会科学版).2016
[8].邵挺,王金照.美国公共政策评估体系的运行情况及启示[N].中国经济时报.2016
[9].邵挺,王金照.美国公共政策评估体系的运行情况及启示——以马萨诸塞州公共住房政策为例[J].智库理论与实践.2016
[10].赵进东.国外公共住房政策对我国保障房运营模式的启示[J].社会科学家.2016