Co-influencing mechanisms of physicochemical properties of blasting dust in iron mines on its wettability

Co-influencing mechanisms of physicochemical properties of blasting dust in iron mines on its wettability

论文摘要

This study explores the key physicochemical factors affecting the hydrophilic characteristics of iron mine blasting dust(BD). The BD is separated into an unwetted part(UWBD, hydrophobic part) and a wetted part(WBD, hydrophilic part). Its particle size, true density(TD), pore parameters, mineral composition, and surface compounds are comprehensively characterized and compared. The results indicate that a smaller particle size and more developed pore parameters are two key factors responsible for the strong hydrophobicity of the BD. The mineral composition of the BD has no direct effect on its wetting properties; however, it indirectly influences the deposition characteristics of the BD in water by affecting its TD. Unlike coal dust, the surface organic composition of the BD does not affect its wettability and the peak area of C–C/C–H hydrophobic groups in the C 1s X-ray photoelectron spectrum of the UWBD(45.03%) is smaller than that in the C 1s spectrum of the WBD(68.30%). Thus, eleven co-influencing processes of physicochemical properties of the BD on its wettability are summarized. This research sheds light on the key factors affecting the wettability of the BD.

论文目录

  • 1. Introduction
  • 2. Experimental
  •   2.1. Materials
  •     2.1.1. Sample collection
  •     2.1.2. Sample pretreatment
  •   2.2. Experiments
  •     2.2.1. Characterization of physical properties
  •     2.2.2. Characterization of chemical properties
  • 3. Results and discussion
  •   3.1. Differences in physical properties of UWBD and WBD
  •     3.1.1. Differences in micromorphologies and particle sizes of UWBD and WBD
  •     3.1.2. Differences in TD and pore parameters of UWBD and WBD
  •   3.2. Differences in chemical properties of UWBD and WBD
  •     3.2.1. Element differences in UWBD and WBD
  •     3.2.2. Differences in mineral compositions of UWBD and WBD
  •     3.2.3. Differences in surface compounds of UWBD and WBD
  •   3.3. Influence of physicochemical properties of BD on its hydrophilicity
  • 4. Conclusions
  • 文章来源

    类型: 期刊论文

    作者: Jian-guo Liu,Long-zhe Jin,Jia-ying Wang,Sheng-nan Ou,Tian-yang Wang

    来源: International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials 2019年09期

    年度: 2019

    分类: 工程科技Ⅰ辑

    专业: 矿业工程,安全科学与灾害防治

    单位: School of Civil and Resource Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing,Key Laboratory of High-Efficient Mining and Safety of Metal Mines of the Ministry of Education, University of Science and Technology Beijing,Mine Emergency Technology Research Center, University of Science and Technology Beijing

    基金: financially supported by the National Key Research and Development Program of China (No. 2017YFC0805204),the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Nos. 51874015 and 51504017)

    分类号: TD714.1

    页码: 1080-1091

    总页数: 12

    文件大小: 2536K

    下载量: 10

    相关论文文献

    • [1].Evaluation and optimization of blasting approaches to reducing oversize boulders and toes in open-pit mine[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2020(03)
    • [2].Understanding the connection between blasting and highwall stability[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2019(01)
    • [3].Evaluation of human response to blasting vibration from excavation of a large scale rock slope:A case study[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2017(02)
    • [4].Effects of torpedo blasting on rockburst prevention during deep coal seam mining in the Upper Silesian Coal Basin[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2017(04)
    • [5].Rock-breaking mechanism and experimental analysis of confined blasting of borehole surrounding rock[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2017(05)
    • [6].Analysis of key technologies and development of integrated digital processing system for cast blasting design[J]. Journal of Central South University 2015(03)
    • [7].Analysis of blasting damage in adjacent mining excavations[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2015(03)
    • [8].Modified scaled distance regression analysis approach for prediction of blast-induced ground vibration in multi-hole blasting[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2019(01)
    • [9].Kinetic energy and its applications in mining engineering[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2017(02)
    • [10].Developing a mathematical assessment model for blasting patterns management: Sungun copper mine[J]. Journal of Central South University 2014(11)
    • [11].Research on the inwall shot blasting of the S30432 high-pressure boiler tube[J]. Baosteel Technical Research 2012(01)
    • [12].Optimization and application of blasting parameters based on the "pushing-wall" mechanism[J]. International Journal of Minerals Metallurgy and Materials 2012(10)
    • [13].Time-frequency characteristics of blasting vibration signals measured in milliseconds[J]. Mining Science and Technology 2011(03)
    • [14].Analysis on control technology for collapsing vibration generated by building demolition blasting[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China) 2010(03)
    • [15].Numerical simulation of stress for the blasting of foundation pit[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China) 2008(04)
    • [16].Analysis of the blasting effect on the electric shove loading efficiency of the open pit[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China) 2008(04)
    • [17].Field experiment for blasting crater[J]. Journal of China University of Mining & Technology 2008(02)
    • [18].Numerical simulation of parallel hole cut blasting with uncharged holes[J]. Journal of University of Science and Technology Beijing 2008(03)
    • [19].Prediction of flyrock in open pit blasting operation using machine learning method[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2013(03)
    • [20].Roof pre-blasting to prevent support crushing and water inrush accidents[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2012(03)
    • [21].Recrystallization of Ni_3 Al Base Single Crystal Alloy IC6SX with Different Surface Mechanical Processes[J]. Journal of Materials Science & Technology 2010(10)
    • [22].Experimental study on stemming effect in rock blasting[J]. Engineering Sciences 2010(04)
    • [23].Effectiveness analysis of methane-drainage by deep-hole controlled pre-splitting blasting for preventing coal and gas outburst[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China) 2009(02)
    • [24].Volumetric changes in the focal areas of seismic events corresponding to destress blasting[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2019(04)
    • [25].Influence of millisecond time,charge length and detonation velocity on blasting vibration[J]. Journal of Central South University 2015(12)
    • [26].A comparison of seismic response to conventional and face destress blasting during deep tunnel development[J]. Journal of Rock Mechanics and Geotechnical Engineering 2019(05)
    • [27].Application of deep borehole blasting on fully mechanized hard top-coal pre-splitting and gas extraction in the special thick seam[J]. International Journal of Mining Science and Technology 2015(05)
    • [28].Numerical study on the fracturing mechanism of shock wave interactions between two adjacent blast holes in deep rock blasting[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2019(04)
    • [29].Seismic effort of blasting wave transmitted in coal-rock mass associated with mining operation[J]. Journal of Central South University 2012(09)
    • [30].Bond interface crack propagation of fresh foundation concrete and rock under blasting load[J]. Journal of Coal Science & Engineering(China) 2009(01)
    Co-influencing mechanisms of physicochemical properties of blasting dust in iron mines on its wettability
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢