余震地震动参数及潜在破坏势研究

余震地震动参数及潜在破坏势研究

论文摘要

历史震害资料表明,一次主震后通常伴有大量余震的发生。由于主震和余震的发震时间间隔较短,使得主震损坏结构在短时间内很难得到有效的修复,因此,主震损伤结构在经历余震时会产生二次损伤,甚至造成结构倒塌。现有的各国抗震设计规范中仅考虑一次地震作用,而忽略了余震的潜在危险。因此,有必要对结构在主、余震联合作用下的破坏势进行评估。而要评估主、余震联合作用的潜在破坏势,需要对主余震序列强度与结构损伤之间的相关性进行充分评估。鉴于上述,本文对主余震序列的强度与结构损伤之间的相关性进行了较为全面地评估,主要内容如下:1)选取662条真实主余震序列作为地震输入。采用21个典型地震动参数用于表征主、余震的地震动强度。对所挑选的真实主余震序列的主、余震强度参数之间的关系进行分析。2)采用Park-Ang损伤指数作为结构损伤指标,以非线性单自由度体系作为分析对象,开展了结构在真实主余震序列作用下的累积损伤和增量损伤,分析了主震参数、余震参数和主余震序列复合型参数与结构累积损伤、增量损伤和损伤比值之间的线性相关性和秩相关性。3)分析了非线性单自由度体系滞回模型对主震参数、余震参数和主余震序列参数与结构损伤之间相关性的影响。研究结果表明,采用“余震强度/主震强度”复合型参数与结构累积损伤和增量损伤之间的相关性较强。非线性单自由度体系滞回模型参数对上述相关性结果的影响较小,可以忽略。

论文目录

  • 摘要
  • Abstract
  • Chapter 1 Introduction
  •   1.1 Research sources and background
  •     1.1.1 Research sources
  •     1.1.2 Research background
  •   1.2 Literature review
  •     1.2.1 Studies on main shocks and aftershocks ground motion characteristics
  •     1.2.2 Effect of aftershocks on structural response
  •     1.2.3 Damage potential of ground motions
  •     1.2.4 Inelastic response spectra due to mainshock-aftershock sequences
  •   1.3 Main contents of this study
  • Chapter 2 Ground motion selection of main shock-aftershock sequences andthe corresponding parameters
  •   2.1 Introduction
  •   2.2 Selection of main shock-aftershock ground motions
  •     2.2.1 Magnitude-distance relationship
  •     2.2.2 Magnitude-acceleration relationship
  •   2.3 Analysis of main shock-aftershock sequence parameters
  •     2.3.1 Ground motion parameters related to acceleration
  •     2.3.2 Ground motion parameters related to velocity
  •     2.3.3 Ground motion parameters related to displacement
  •   2.4 Chapter Summary
  • Chapter 3 Correlation between main shock-aftershock intensities andstructural damages
  •   3.1 Introduction
  •   3.2 Nonlinear SDOF system and structural damage index
  •     3.2.1 Modeling of nonlinear SDOF system
  •     3.2.2 Selection of Structural Damage Index
  •   3.3 Cumulative damage and incremental damage
  •   3.4 Linear Correlation assessment
  •   3.5 Chapter summary
  • Chapter 4 Effects of hysteretic behaviors on correlation between main shock-aftershock intensities and structural damages
  •   4.1 Introduction
  •   4.2 Pearson correlation coefficients corresponding to R=2
  •     4.2.1 Results related to the acceleration-based parameters
  •     4.2.2 Results related to the velocity-based parameters
  •     4.2.3 Results related to the displacement-based parameters
  •   4.3 Pearson correlation coefficients corresponding to R=3
  •     4.3.1 Results related to the acceleration-based parameters
  •     4.3.2 Results related to the velocity-based parameters
  •     4.3.3 Results related to the displacement-based parameters
  •   4.4 Pearson correlation coefficients corresponding to R=4
  •     4.4.1 Results related to the acceleration-based parameters
  •     4.4.2 Results related to the velocity-based parameters
  •     4.4.3 Results related to the displacement-based parameters
  •   4.5 Pearson correlation coefficients corresponding to R=5
  •     4.5.1 Results related to the acceleration-based parameters
  •     4.5.2 Results related to the displacement-based parameters
  •     4.5.3 Results related to the displacement-based parameters
  •   4.6 Chapter summary
  • Conclusions
  • References
  • Acknowledgements
  • Resume
  • 文章来源

    类型: 硕士论文

    作者: 艾萨姆(Esam Abdullah Saeed Haidar AL-athwari)

    导师: 于晓辉

    关键词: 主余震序列,体系,累积损伤,增量损伤,损伤指数,滞回特性

    来源: 哈尔滨工业大学

    年度: 2019

    分类: 基础科学

    专业: 地质学,地球物理学

    单位: 哈尔滨工业大学

    基金: the National Natural Science Foundation Youth Project “Study on Multi-element Joint Vulnerability of Reinforced Concrete Frame Structures under Main shocks-Aftershocks Sequences”(Project Approval Number:51408155)

    分类号: P315.9

    DOI: 10.27061/d.cnki.ghgdu.2019.001978

    总页数: 113

    文件大小: 25255K

    下载量: 39

    相关论文文献

    • [1].Development of an aftershock occurrence model calibrated for Turkey and the resulting likelihoods[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2020(01)
    • [2].Study of the correlations between main shocks and aftershocks and aftershock synthesis method[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2019(04)
    • [3].Hysteretic energy prediction method for mainshock-aftershock sequences[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2018(02)
    • [4].Seismic imaging of aftershock gap between Lushan and Wenchuan earthquakes[J]. Global Geology 2017(02)
    • [5].Hong Kong Hero[J]. China Today 2010(12)
    • [6].A Brief Introduction to the Wenchuan M_S8.0 Earthquake Sequence,May 12,2008[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2008(02)
    • [7].Preliminary study on aftershock decay rate of the 2013 Ms 7.0 Lushan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Science 2013(Z1)
    • [8].Relocation of the mainshock and aftershock sequences of M_S7.0 Sichuan Lushan earthquake[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin 2013(Z2)
    • [9].Characteristics of the May 12,2008 Wenchuan M_S8.0 Earthquake Sequence and Discussion on Relevant Problems[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2009(01)
    • [10].Spatio-temporal variation of the stress field in the Wenchuan aftershock region[J]. Earthquake Science 2012(Z1)
    • [11].Improved HVSR site classification method for free-field strong motion stations validated with Wenchuan aftershock recordings[J]. Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration 2011(03)
    • [12].Scaling behavior of magnitude clusters in aftershock sequence:An example of the Wenchuan Earthquake,China[J]. Science China(Earth Sciences) 2012(03)
    • [13].The strong ground motion observation for the Wenchuan aftershock[J]. Earthquake Science 2009(02)
    • [14].Difference between focal mechanisms of Dayao earthquake doublet sequence[J]. Earthquake Science 2009(06)
    • [15].Comparative Study of Changes in Stress-drop of the Jinggu M_S6.6 and Ludian M_S6.5 Earthquake Sequences[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2017(02)
    • [16].Characteristics of Seismic Sequences and Early Tendency Judgment for Yutian M_S7.3 Earthquake in 2014[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2015(03)
    • [17].Relocation of the M8.0 Wenchuan earthquake and its aftershock sequence[J]. Science in China(Series D:Earth Sciences) 2008(12)
    • [18].Slip model for the 2011 M_w 9.0 Sendai (Japan) earthquake and its M_w 7.9 aftershock derived from GPS data[J]. Chinese Science Bulletin 2011(27)
    • [19].Uneven aftershock distribution of Wenchuan Ms8.0 earthquake and possible mechanism[J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics 2011(02)
    • [20].Spatio-temporal epidemic type aftershock sequence model for Tangshan aftershock sequence[J]. Earthquake Science 2011(05)
    • [21].Research on Stress Drops and the Focal Mechanisms of the Xinyuan-Hejing M_L6. 8 Earthquake Sequences[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2017(01)
    • [22].Post-seismic relaxation from geodetic and seismic data[J]. Geodesy and Geodynamics 2017(01)
    • [23].Long aftershock sequences in North China and Central US: implications for hazard assessment in mid-continents[J]. Earthquake Science 2014(01)
    • [24].A tentative model for the explanation of B?th law using the order parameter of seismicity in natural time[J]. Earthquake Science 2016(06)
    • [25].A Review of Aftershock Mechanism Research[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2013(03)
    • [26].Relocation of the 2008 Panzhihua M_S6.1 Earthquake Sequence[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2015(03)
    • [27].Relocation of aftershocks of the Wenchuan M_S8.0 earthquake and its implication to seismotectonics[J]. Earthquake Science 2011(01)
    • [28].Spatio-temporal characteristics of strong aftershocks of the M_S8.0 Wenchuan earthquake[J]. Earthquake Science 2010(03)
    • [29].Source parameter and rupture process of the M_W6.3 early strong aftershock immediately following the 2016 M_W7.8 Kaikoura earthquake(New Zealand)[J]. Earthquake Science 2019(01)
    • [30].The Co-seismic Response of Underground Fluid in Yunnan to the Nepal M_S8.1 Earthquake[J]. Earthquake Research in China 2017(02)

    标签:;  ;  ;  ;  ;  ;  

    余震地震动参数及潜在破坏势研究
    下载Doc文档

    猜你喜欢